NEWS

Louisiana Board of Social Work Examiners

Spring, 2001

Dorinda N. Noble, LCSW
Chairperson
Baton Rouge, LA
E. Taylor Aultman, Jr. LCSW
Vice-Chairperson
New Orleans, LA
Gretchen Goodrich, LCSW
Secretary/Treasurer
Baton Rouge, LA
Theresa Earthly, LCSW
Board Member
Alexandria, LA
Robert Showers, RSW
Board Member
Independence, LA
Kenna Morgan Franklin, GSW
Board Member
Shreveport, LA
Janet Cothern Zelden
Public Board Member
Mandeville, LA
Traci F. Lilley, LCSW
Print Editor

Brenda B. Trivette, LCSW, Contributing Editor

Onesimus Internet Solutions, Inc.
Online Editor

Inside this Issue:

The Disciplinary Process?

Summary of 99-00 complaints

Louisiana Takes Top Honor

The Year of Grace: 2000

Board Meeting Dates

Many Thanks to Suzanne and Staff

MSW/GSW Update

Testing Fee Increase

Board To Review All Supervision Plans

Message From Your Public Member

Public Member Profile

Board Vacancies

Board Member Responsibilities

LABSWE and Professional Organizations

Welcome New Licensees

About Your Address

In Remembrance

Frequently Asked Questions

The Disciplinary Process

Dorinda Noble, LCSW

 

I heard that a person I graduated with is coming before the Board in a disciplinary hearing. Has someone made a complaint against me? If you were holding a disciplinary hearing about my practice, would I know it?”

These kinds of questions are commonly fielded by LABSWE staff, and they demonstrate that many of the state’s social workers are unclear about how the Board handles complaints and disciplinary matters.

 

LABSWE’s Rules, Standards, and Procedures lays out the disciplinary process in great detail. The Social Work Practice Act mandates that instances of professional misconduct should be investigated and resolved in order to protect the public from incompetent or unethical practice. The person against whom the complaint is brought (the Respondent) , however, has due process rights which are carefully guarded through the process; the Louisiana Administrative Practices Act helps ensure that the process is fair and impartial. Here is an overview of the disciplinary process:

 

COMPLAINT. All social workers should abide by the Standards of Conduct (Chapter 1 of the Rules, Standards, and Procedures). If a member of the public believes that a social worker has violated those standards, he/she should report this matter to LABSWE on the Complaint Report Form available from the LABSWE office. The complaint must be signed.

 

At the next regularly scheduled Board meeting, Board members will review the complaint in executive session. Board members will ask two questions: 1) Does the Respondent fall under the Social Work Practice Act? and 2) Would the alleged behavior, if proven, rise to the level of a violation of the law or the rules? If the answer to these two questions is yes, the matter is referred for investigation.

 

INVESTIGATION. The LABSWE administrator in relatively simple matters can handle investigation. In more complex situations, LABSWE refers the matter to one of its Complaint Investigation Officers (CIO), individuals who are both social workers and licensed private detectives. At this point, the Respondent receives a copy of the complaint. Board members do not participate in the investigation process and, in fact, never see the investigative file.

The Disciplinary Process ( continued from page 1)

The CIO has 60 days to investigate the complaint, though he/she may seek and receive an extension of time if needed. When the investigation is complete, the CIO recommends one of two courses of action to the Board:

(1) DISMISSAL. If the CIO finds that the allegations cannot be proved, the CIO recommends that the Board dismiss the matter. The Board will act on this recommendation at its next meeting, and the Respondent will be notified that the case is closed. Written documentation is kept in a file separate from the social worker’s credential files.

 

(2) CONTINUE THE PROCESS. If the CIO believes that the alleged behavior is likely true and violates the law, he/she recommends a disciplinary hearing. The Board will then turn the matter over to the Attorney General’s Office.

 

ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT. When a case continues in the process, the CIO submits the investigative file to the Assistant Attorney General (AAG) assigned to LABSWE. The AAG, after studying the investigative file and the law, drafts an Administrative Complaint setting out the issues uncovered during the investigation and their relationship to the law. This draft is sent to the respondent, who has a reasonable amount of time to respond to the charges. If that response adequately addressed the charges, the AAG may drop the matter. If, however, the response is not deemed to adequately explain the charges, the AAG prepares the final Administrative Complaint and sends it to the Board.

 

CONSENT ORDER. At any point during this process, the Respondent may choose to enter into a consent order with LABSWE . Similar to a plea agreement, the consent order must be approved and signed by the Board in a formal hearing. When a consent order is entered into a case, the Respondent forfeits any rights of appeal.

 

DISCIPLINARY HEARING. If the Respondent does not enter into a consent order, a disciplinary hearing is scheduled. The burden of proof lies on the state to prove that allegations of misconduct are true and violate the law, and the decision requires a preponderance of evidence rather than proof beyond a reasonable doubt. The hearing is recorded and transcribed by a court reporter. Five Board members sit as a Hearing Panel; because they have not been involved in the investigation nor have they seen the investigative file, these board members are untainted by any facets of the investigation or any preconceived notions of whether the allegations are valid. The Respondent has the right to legal representation and to present any evidence to support his/her case.

LABSWE DECISION IS RENDERED. When all the testimony is complete, the Hearing Panel has 60 days to deliberate, examine testimony, arrive at a decision and write it, and send the decision to the Respondent. If the Panel finds that the Respondent has not acted in violation of the law, the matter is closed. If, however, the Panel finds that the Respondent has violated the law, the decision will carry appropriate sanctions (including probation, suspension, or revocation of the social worker’s credential). The Respondent has the right to appeal this decision to the 19th Judicial District Court; further appeals go to the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals and finally the state Supreme Court. When LABSWE finds against the Respondent, the Respondent is held responsible for LABSWE’s costs of investigation and handling the matter.

This process is complex and time-consuming. The various stages of the process, however, serve to protect the due process rights of the social worker, to protect the public, and to ensure that matters are handled in a fair and objective fashion.

Back to TOP

Recap of 1999 – 2000 Complaints Received by the

Louisiana State Board of Social Work Examiners

(July 1, 1999 through June 30, 2000)

 

Violations: Number:
Exploitation 11
Records 1
Competency 4
Child Custody 7
Relationships 4
Fee Issues 1
For not reporting child abuse 1
Practicing social work without a license 1
Misrepresentation of credentials 2
Fraud 1
Supervision issues 1
Sexual abuse of client 1
TOTAL 35

Back to TOP

LOUISIANA TAKES TOP HONOR

At the Fall Delegate Assembly of the Association of Social Work Boards held in Mesa, Arizona on November 10 and 11, 2000 the Board’s publication, Supervision for Professional Development and Public Protection: A Guide, won the Association’s award for Superior Consumer Publication for the Year 2000. Congratulations to authors Drayton Vincent, LCSW and Dorinda Noble, LCSW.

Dorinda Noble received a publication award from Janice James, President of Association of Social Work Boards.

 

 

The Year of Grace: 2000

The 1999 Social Work Practice Act became law on January 1, 2000. Social workers across the state had the full calendar year of 2000 to comply with the law. LABSWE left no stone unturned to inform social workers in Louisiana about the law and its requirements. To that end, LABSWE sent numerous informative mailings and newsletters to well over 5000 social workers. LABSWE, after surveying United Way agency listings in every community in the state, sent flyers and posters to these agencies to inform employees about the law. Posters, flyers, and letters were also sent to all state agencies. The Board posted all of the new information, regulations, and forms on their webpage (labswe.org). The LABSWE web site received thousands of hits from people seeking information. Board members and staff made presentations to professional and agency groups when requested. LABSWE exhausted every avenue to inform and educate the social work community of the new rules and procedures which social workers should follow to comply with the law.

Back to TOP

Board Meeting Dates for 2001:

March 30
May 4
June 8
July 13
August 17
September 21
October 26
December 7

You may contact the board office concerning the times and places.

LABSWE falls under the Louisiana Open Meetings Act. This law specifies that every meeting shall be open to the public, unless the subject of the meeting relates the character and professional competence of a person, or to the investigation of a complaint or negotiation of litigation. The schedule for each LABSWE meeting is posted 24 hours ahead of the scheduled meeting. All votes are public, as are all minutes of the meetings.

Back to TOP

MANY THANKS TO SUZANNE AND THE STAFF!!

 

LABSWE, which shares staff and office space with boards regulating dietitians and speech therapists in Louisiana, is extremely fortunate to have an excellent staff to administer its work. Suzanne Pevey, our able Administrator, has been with this Board almost since the inception in 1972; she has the longest tenure of any social work Board administrator in the nation. She is a wealth of information and insight about professional regulation. Emily Efferson, one of her able assistants, is assigned to LABSWE. All the staff are exceptionally capable and cordial. The work load for them has been crushing over the last year, as they have overseen the implementation of the new law and thousands of social workers coming into compliance with that law. When you have contact with these staff members, please remember; They are not responsible for creating that law; their job is to administer the work of the three Boards which employ them. Tell them you appreciate them and their hard work...LABSWE certainly does!!!

Back to TOP

MSW/GSW Update

If an MSW is working as a social worker, he or she must file an application with the Board office immediately upon graduation.

 

bullet

MSWs can work up to 120 days while they are completing the application process, i.e., securing official transcript and taking and passing the Intermediate Examination.

bullet

If MSWs do not take and pass the examination before the end of the 120 days, LABSWE will send them a certified letter advising that the approval period has lapsed and that they cannot work as a social worker until they have successfully passed the exam.

bullet

If MSWs allow their approval period to lapse without taking the examination, they must submit another application and fee.

 

If an MSW fails the Intermediate Examination, LABSWE will automatically grant them the Provisional GSW and include a letter that lists the conditions for maintaining it. No additional fee will be charged.

 

TESTING FEE INCREASE

 

The Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB) voted to increase the examination fee for all of the social work examinations on April 1, 2001. The fee will increase from $110.00 per exam to $175.00. The most important consideration in raising the fee was the association’s costs to maintain the examination program. The association is committed to meeting its responsibility to member boards and to examination candidates by maintaining a high quality testing program.

Back to TOP

BOARD WILL REVIEW ALL SUPERVISION PLANS

 

Many people do not realize that supervision forms follow professionals thru their careers. Should a professional relocate to another state and attempt to secure licensure there, that state will request those supervision forms. That is why it is critical that supervision forms be done in a thoughtful manner, and be completely legible. LABSWE requires that supervision forms be originals without white-out corrections to eliminate any question of fraud. They must demonstrate that supervision goals and activities have been personalized for the particular GSW seeking licensure.

 

Starting January 1, 2001 all supervision plans will be reviewed by a board member. All previous plans were reviewed by staff members for accuracy of content. Starting January 1, 2001 all supervision plans submitted to the SBSWE will be reviewed by a Board member. The content of supervision will be the priority, and Board members will be providing feedback. Many supervision plans may be returned for revisions or clarification to the BACS and supervisee. For more information refer to Supervision for Professional Development and Public Protection: A Guide.

 

A Message from the LABSWE Public Member…

Louisiana is NOT Last, Janet Zelden

With the enactment of the 1999 Louisiana Social Work Practice Act, your regulatory board expanded from five members to seven. The law includes a public member on the Board and maintains an odd number of members, (that is odd number...not odd member!) to ensure that no votes are tie votes. Some states have regulatory boards which do not include a public or consumer member. Hence the headline...Louisiana is not last on the list of innovative states!!

 

It can now be said that the Board has something old and something new...yours truly. I am a retired educator (elementary teacher and principal for 33 years). That makes me OLD, but since I am the first public member, that makes me NEW. I am serving voluntary (no pay) term of three years. My function is to directly represent the public interest on the Board. The Board’s mandate is to protect the consumer by ensuring that Louisiana social workers have supervision and education that ensures professional integrity and competence in practice.

 

In November I attended a meeting hosted by Citizens Advocacy Center (CAC), a national service organization comprised of public members from licensing boards of various professions across the nation. There I learned that “a healthy Board is one that focuses on the consumer and not on itself”. I think that LABSWE lives out that admonition. I have truly been impressed with the other six members on our Board. Not only are they social workers with a vested interest in the profession, but they also focus on the consumer. Together, we work to keep the profession operating at its highest level for the good of all.

 

Given my career, it should be no surprise that I believe in education. Just as a car needs fuel to keep running, we need continuing education to perform at our best. Therefore, providing you with practical, high-quality continuing education is one of my interests on the Board. Having worked for numerous years with various social workers, I have the utmost fondness and respect for your profession. I pledge to do my best to keep it that way.

Back to TOP

Public Member Profile

 

Public members are often found on professional regulatory boards. Public members:

bullet

Offer the viewpoint of the public in Board deliberations;

bullet

Have no formal association with the profession or member of the profession;

bullet

May lower the possibility of Board decisions to favor the profession over the public interests;

bullet

Increase public trust in government and lends credibility to the work of the Board;

bullet

Bring a new range of experience and perspectives to Board deliberations;

bullet

Do not bring technical social work expertise to the Board.

 

BOARD VACANCIES

On July 26, 2001, there will be two vacancies on the Louisiana State Board of Social Work Examiners. LSA R.S. 37:2704, mandates the following qualifications for Board members:

bullet

Citizen of the United States,

bullet

Resident of the State of Louisiana,

bullet

Hold current, valid license, certification or registration

bullet

At all times the Board shall consist of at least three members who are engaged primarily in rendering direct services in social work and at least one member who is engaged primarily in social work education or a practice specialty other than clinic.

One vacancy must be filled by a social worker credentialed at the LCSW level and the other vacancy may be filled by a social worker credentialed at the RSW, GSW or LCSW levels. The remaining Board members and their areas of practice are as follows: E. Taylor Aultman, Jr., LCSW, direct practice, Theresa Earthly, LCSW, direct practice, Robert Showers, RSW, agency practice, Kenna Franklin, GSW, educator, and Janet Zelden, public member.

 

If you are interested in serving on the Board, you should submit a letter stating your interest and a resume to the Board office or one of the following organizations by May 31, 2001:

 

Louisiana Association of Clinical Social Workers

5329 Dijon Drive, Suite 105

Baton Rouge, LA 70808

 

Louisiana Chapter of National Association of Social Workers

700 N. 10th Street, Suite 200

Baton Rouge, LA 70801

 

Louisiana Council on Social Work Education

311 Huey P. Long Fieldhouse, LSU

Baton Rouge, LA 70803

 

Board members are appointed by the Governor to serve for three (3) consecutive years. You may contact Suzanne Pevey, Administrator, at the Board office (225-763-5470 or 800-521-1941) if you have questions concerning the Board’s activities and the time commitment required of Board members.

Back to TOP

BOARD MEMBER RESPONSIBILITIES

 

Members of LABSWE are not paid for their efforts, though they are reimbursed for travel, lodging, and meals incurred during Board meetings and functions. Nor can they profit directly from their Board service.

LABSWE is a hard-working unit; it meets once a month for two days (Friday and Saturday), and may meet more often than that. All members are expected to be present for meetings except in unusual circumstances.

Because LABSWE oversees a complex practice act, the learning curve is steep for new members. Members are expected to do a good deal of thinking, reading, and studying to fulfill their roles, particularly in the area of administrative law. They are also expected to maintain the highest standards of confidentiality and ethics.

Many LABSWE members find it challenging to move out of the role of social worker and into the role of legal administrator. Board members often acknowledge that the most difficult aspect of their role is sitting in judgment of their peers. They also say that service on the LABSWE is a rich and interesting experience which gives them a broader, more comprehensive picture of the profession and its many aspects.

Back to TOP

LABSWE and Professional Associations

 

Do I have to belong to any professional association in order to be credentialed in Louisiana?” The answer to this frequently asked question is “no”. Neither the 1999 Louisiana Social Work Practice Act nor its 1972 predecessor requires any collateral membership. Many social workers, however, are confused about the connections between professional associations (such as National Association of Social Workers, or Louisiana Clinical Society, or other worthwhile groups), and the state credentialing structure (Louisiana Board of Social Work Examiners, or LABSWE).

In order to practice legally in this state, a social worker must be credentialed; every state in the union, as well as many U.S. territories, a number of Canadian provinces, and several foreign countries also credential social workers. A professional has to be credentialed; he/she gets to belong to a professional association. Professional associations and state credentialing bodies differ in several ways.

STRUCTURE: A professional association is a not-for-profit corporation formed at the national, state, or local level and recognized as 501©(6) organizations under Internal Revenue Code. State credentialing boards are formed by the state legislatures through practice acts.

MEMBERS: The association’s primary member is the individual professional who joins on a voluntary basis, though the group may also allow related professionals and agencies to join. Members of credentialing boards, however, are selected by the governor (as in Louisiana) or the director of the supervising agency (such as Department of Human Services in some states). The state senate must confirm them. Credentialing board members are often selected from lists submitted by professional organizations (as is true in Louisiana), but board members’ duties are established by statute.

PURPOSES: Professional associations strive to promote effective services and enhance the status and benefits of the profession. The over-arching purpose of the credentialing board is to protect the public.

DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES: Associations often establish internal disciplinary procedures, such as sanctions or expulsion from membership, when members violate the Code of Ethics. Such disciplinary actions taint the individual’s professional reputation and may block her/him from employment in various settings. Credentialing boards, however, carry out the disciplinary actions set forth in the practice act, in order to protect the public. Suspension or revocation of a credential not only taints the professional’s image, but eliminates him/her from practice.

OUTSIDE SUPERVISION: Associations are supervised from the outside by courts. Courts are reluctant to interfere with professional associations except where the association’s conduct may violate federal or state laws (such as the anti-trust laws), or when association disciplinary procedures may not have provided due process to the member. Courts supervise credentialing boards, and the actions of the board normally can be appealed to the courts for review. Board members are subject to possible lawsuits. In addition, boards’ finances and procedures are reviewed by state legislatures and appropriate agencies, and boards may be subject to sunset review laws.

PROTECTIONS WHICH MUST BE GUARANTEED: Private associations must afford their members procedural due process. Credentialing boards must assure both substantive and procedural due process, generally accomplished through the state Administrative Procedures Act.

Both LABSWE and professional associations are committed to protecting the public. LABSWE’s single focus on public protection, however, could conceivably be at odds with association’s interests in professional enhancement, so, during their tenure, LABSWE board members do not serve on professional association boards. (Numerous court decisions have recognized the different purposes of professional associations and state boards, and have held board members to be in violation of their regulatory responsibilities when they are closely associated with professional associations).. Nevertheless, LABSWE is fully committed to working cooperatively with professional associations in matters that can protect the public and values the resources that associations can provide in formulating sound professional principles, supporting worthwhile legislation, and clarifying professional roles and rules.

Back to TOP

About your address.....

The address and telephone number that you list on your application for license and subsequent renewal application is a matter of public record. We do honor written requests to delete addresses and telephone numbers in our annual Directory. However, if a member of the public calls and requests that information, we are required by law to give the most recent information that we have. LCSWs may want to consider listing only their office address and office telephone number on their renewal application.

In Remembrance:NA00401_.WMF (13388 bytes)

Brooksie B. Kelly, LCSW

West Monroe, LA

 

The Louisiana State Board of Social Work Examiners will publish notification of a licensee’s death following submission of information by a current LCSW or family member

Back to TOP

Frequently asked questions . . . .

by Brenda Trivette, LCSW

 

1. A social worker is seeing two teenage brothers, ages 16 and 17. The parents have joint custody but the boys live with their father. The mother dropped out of sight several months ago, but is back and wants copies of all the boys’ records. She also does not want the social worker to tell the boys she is giving the records to her. Does the social worker have to give the mother a copy of the boys’ records? How should the social worker handle this matter?

 

There are some mistaken notions about the respective authority of parents of minor children relating to healthcare decisions and access to minor’s healthcare records. The joint custody decree of implementation order usually allocates the legal authority of both parents. Generally, the joint custody decree will designate a domiciliary parent (parent with whom the child shall primarily reside) which parent shall be granted decision-making authority unless the order provides otherwise. All major decisions affecting the child are subject to court review on request of the other parent, although the law presumes such decisions made by the domiciliary parent were made in the best interest of the child.

 

If a domiciliary parent is not designated, both parents have the same decision-making authority as parents living together. Even when a domiciliary parent is designated, the law obligates parents to exchange information concerning the health, education and welfare of the child and to confer with one another in exercising decision-making authority.

 

The law also makes it clear that access to the minor’s medical, dental and school records as well as other information “shall not be denied to a parent solely because he is not the child’s custodial or domiciliary parent.” La. R.S. 9§ 351. Therefore, under most circumstances, the father’s permission would not be required for the mother to have access to the social work records of her minor teenage sons. The social worker may not agree to shield the mother’s request for her sons’ records from their father or from the boys themselves. Such secrecy not only could be damaging to the therapeutic alliance but also could engender an information power-struggle between the parents concerning the very data they have a legal obligation to exchange.

 

Social workers treating or evaluating minor children in circumstances of divorce or separation of the parents should become aware of any joint custody decree or orders and may request a copy if there is any uncertainty. Depending upon the subject matter of the social work issues, and the stated ages of the boys, it may be appropriate to obtain a written consent from the boys prior to releasing their social work records to either parent.

 

2. A social worker is asked to do an assessment of an adult female who has obviously been beaten. The woman has a mental health diagnosis. Is the social worker required to report this matter to the authorities?

 

An adult client (whether male or female) who has been subjected to an obvious beating requires an assessment to determine if the client is a “disabled person” (one “with a mental, physical, or developmental disability that substantially impairs the person’s ability to provide adequately for his own care or protection”). If the adult is disabled or is of the age of 60 years or older the social worker is required to report the abuse (also neglect and exploitation) to either an adult protection agency or to state and local law enforcement under La. R.S. 14:403.2(D).

 

If the adult female in this question is under 60 and is not disabled as previously defined, the social worker is not a mandatory reporter and should maintain client confidentiality. Nevertheless, the social worker should assist the client access medical, educational, legal and support services for battered women, if appropriate, and may also encourage the client to report the beating to appropriate law enforcement agencies.

 

3. If an individual with a bachelor’s or master’s degree in social work continues to work after January 1, 2001 without receiving either the RSW or GSW credential, what happens to them when they do apply for the credential?

 

They will be required to pass an Open Book Examination on the Louisiana Social Work Practice Act and the Board’s Rules, Standards and Procedures (developed by the Board) if they work for more than 120 days without the proper social work credential. Should the social worker not apply for any credential they will receive a letter from the Board’s Administrator notifying them to cease and desist practicing social work. Should that letter go unheeded, the social worker will be subject to misdemeanor violations under the Social Work Practice Act (La. R.S. 37:2720 (A)(1)) for engaging in the practice of social work without being duly certified or registered. The Board also has the authority to enjoin the social work practice in District Court.

 

4. How does a GSW working as the salaried employee in an agency determine if he/she is practicing clinical social work?

 

Rule No. 505. A. of the Board’s Rules, Standards and Procedures requires that GSWs not pursuing LCSW licensure, or who are fulfilling the experience requirement toward licensure, may deliver clinical services which constitute psychotherapy only under the supervision of an LCSW. If you are unsure if you are practicing clinical social work which constitutes psychotherapy, you should review the definition of Clinical Social Work Practice and Psychotherapy listed in Rule No. 301 with your agency administration and/or supervisor to determine if your job description and duties meet the definitions.

5. An MSW working in a nursing home discovers that a patient has been sexually abused by a member of the staff. What is the MSW’s responsibility?

 

The MSW’s responsibility is to report the incident immediately to the police. Good social work practice includes reporting to your immediate supervisor in the nursing home as well.

6. An LCSW has an adult client who lives at home with parents, and the parents pay for his therapy. The client is in school full-time and has a mental health diagnosis that affects his performance. His parents would like the social worker to write a letter to the dean of the school explaining his condition, so that the dean will allow him some flexibility. Does the social worker need a release from the client, the parents, or both to write the letter?

 

The social worker does not need a signed release from the parents unless the client is, for some reason, ruled incompetent. An adult client, regardless of who pays the bills, would have to authorize such action with a signed release.

 

7. An LCSW has another credentialed social worker as a client in her clinical practice. In the course of therapy, the client (social worker) reveals that she is having an affair and sexual relationship with one of her clients. Does the treating social worker have a duty to mandatory report this matter to the Social Work Board?

 

No, because the superceding ethical issue in this situation is one of confidentiality. The best interest of the client (the social worker seeking treatment) would not be served by such mandatory reporting of an ethical violation. The practitioner should be urged to 1) end the personal relationships with her own client and 2) provide that client with appropriate referrals for additional treatment opportunities, and 3) self-report the matter to the Board. The social worker (client) should continue to work in her own therapy to determine what led to this ethical infraction in order to ensure that it will not be repeated The affected client, however, has the right to report it to the Board at anytime.

Back to TOP

 

SO00629_.WMF (4070 bytes)Welcome New LCSWsSO00629_.WMF (4070 bytes)

The following social workers have been granted the LCSW license by the Board since the last newsletter:

Adams, Glenda

Adams, Lori

Alikhani, Sarah

Allen, Elizabeth

Antrobus, Elise

Aranda, Brenda

Austin, Tanya

Bates, Angel

Bauer, Elizabeth

Beniger, Robin

Bennett, Fay

Benton, Stephen

Bhushan, Madhu

Bonitatibus, Jennifer

Bowie, Nicole

Braud, Janis

Breaux, Helene

Bruneau, Arianne

Burns, Gary

Cage, Lori

Canterbury, Eddie

Cerise, Ashley

Chatelain, Jan

Chiasson-Breaux, Denise

Clark, Bridget

Clark, Pauline

Claypool, Ann

Coffey, Leeann

Collett, William

Collins, Karen

Correro, Angela

Cuneo, Carlo

Dejan, Kellie

Dugas, Patsy

Dyeson, Timothy

Flanagan, Nell

Fletcher, Robb

Flynn, Melinda

French, Allison

Gachassin, Johnnie

Grayson, Candance

Greene, Margaret

Groover, Benjamin

Guidry, Sandra

Guy, Kimberly

Haase, Nancy

Harper, Valerie

Hawley, Patrick

Hebert, Andrea

Hubert, Rebecca

Huval, Angel

Johnson, Trenese

Jokinen, Alicia

Kalifey, Janell

Koch, Lynne

Leader, Kelli

Legnon, Renee

Lewis, Gail

Lyman, Dorothy

Maclean, Stephanie

Maier, Elizabeth

Martin-Clark, Sarosa

May, Heather

Michels, Janet

Millet, Manette

Mills, Kerrie

Morse, Donna

Oliveira, Deborah

Outlaw, Stacy

Owens, Annie

Pickup, Joan

Poimboeuf, John

Powell, Desarae

Richardson, Kimberly

Rife, Ryan

Robert, Violet

Robertson, Lauren

Robinson, Alex

Romero, Wendy

Rovaris, James

Ryan, Ximaena

Schnitzler, Dan

Seiler, Katherine

Sevalia, Jr, Robert

Sharkey, Lesa

Simon-Bowie, Sudeeptha

Smith, James

Snyder, Jr, Thomas

Stalls, Amy

Tahir, Lisa

Thomas, Lora

Threatts, Tammy

Treigle, Dawn

Tyler, Kaye

Valiquette, Thomas

Walker, Nelwyn

Wambsgans, Sylvia

Warren, Kim

Weiss, Betsy

Wellborn, Jennifer

Whitlow, Sharon

Williams, Annette

Willis, Sybil

Back to TOP

Welcome New GSWs

The following social workers have been granted the GSW certification by the Board since the last newsletter:

Abel, Allison

Abel, Mary Ann

Acorn-Mcmillan, Jo Ann

Adams, Evelyn

Adams, Kimberly

Adams, Shenicka

Adams, Tasha

Adcock, Ray

Agu, Chinyere

Agurcia-Smith, Ester

Allison, Joanna

Allord, Catherine

Alonzo, Tracy

Alston, Bonnie

Amos, Carlos

Anderson, Brian

Anderson, Cathleen

Anderson, Geraldine

Anderson, Kimberly

Anderson, Richard

Anderson-Hilton, Juanita

Ard, Jennie

Ardoin, Anthony

Arnold, Barbara

Aubin, Amy

Aubrey, Agnes

Aubry, Michael

Auguillard-Manego, Marie

Austin, Karen

Babineaux, Amy

Bagalman, Jill

Bagley Iii, Edward

Bailey, Christopher

Baker, Joan

Baloney, Sr., Carl

Banda, Archana

Banks, Chalonda

Barden, Virginia

Barfield, Cathy

Barker, Birdel

Barker, Jamie

Barnett, Cathy

Barrett, Robin

Bartleson, Kimberly

Barton, Cheryl

Bassett, Jean

Bassett, Nathan

Bates, Charlotte

Bates, Scott

Batiste, Tiffany

Beasley, Juanita

Beauregard, Christina

Beck, Michele

Bell, Pamela

Belou, Stacy

Belser, Mary Jo

Benge, Denise

Benoit, Judith Ann

Bentil, Phyllis

Bergeron, Gina

Bernard, Sheila

Bezet, Sandy

Biagi, Debra

Billiot, Marleen

Bishopric, Sarah

Bison, Tracy

Black, Jean

Black, Kelly

Blake, Linda

Blanchard, Alecia

Blanchard, Misty

Blanchard, Victor

Blanchard, Jr, Edgar

Blank, Christina

Blayre, Stephanie

Blomkalns, Sara

Bode, Brian

Bongiovani, Gasper

Bonura, Christine

Bonvillain, R

Booker, Aundrial

Bordelon, Wanda

Bordenave, Tracey

Borne, Myra

Borne, Nikki

Boudreaux, Daniel

Boudreaux, Theresa

Boutte', Mary

Boylan, Gail

Brady, Eric

Breaux, Danielle

Breaux, Melissa

Breaux, Shannon

Bridges-Worthy, Sharon

Brisco, Robert

Brittenham, Michelle

Brooks, Erica

Brooks, Fetinia

Brooks, June

Brossett, Angela

Broussard, Dina

Brown, Bernice

Brown, Danelle

Brown, Richard

Brown, Steven

Bryan, Jean

Buck, Jaime

Buddington, Steve

Burke, Eddie

Burns, Lisa

Burton, Cynthia

Butler, Harold

Butler, Mary

Butler, Maureen

Buxton, Jean-Marie

Buxton, Toni

Byrd, Donald

Cacamo, Aimee

Cage, Deborah

Cain, Madeline

Caldwell, Lynette

Calvey, Latonya

Cambrice, Trinette

Camp, Joy

Canone, Kelly

Capdeboscq, Stacie

Capouch, Patricia

Cappello, Valerie

Carey, Shangrila

Carmouche, Sontra

Carter, Alicia

Carter, Angela

Carter, Ashley

Carter, Raegan

Castiglione, Brandi

Celestine, Gisele

Chaney-Baker, Doris

Chaplain, Maurine

Chapman, Kimberly

Charles, Clementine

Charrier, Clara

Chatman, Ricky

Chauvin, Lisa

Cheffin, Cassandra

Chenevert-Roan, Jean

Chiasson, Tina

Chrishon, Constance

Christophe, Betty

Cipriano, Katherine

Claiborne, Patrina

Clark, Patricia

Clark, Yvarra

Clary, Deborah

Clay, Grace

Clay, Terry

Cleary, Kristina

Clemmer, Chanin

Clemons, Kay

Cole, Deloris

Coleman, Clois

Coleman-Ashton, Shontai

Coley, Alicia

Collins, Cherie

Collins, Jessica

Collins, Leigh

Colston, Consuela

Colston, Shirley

Comas, Ariadne

Conerly, Linnette

Conerly, Najla

Cook, Ann

Coolie, Lorie

Cooper-North, Pauline

Cormier, Rashied

Cormier, Tracy

Cornelius, Sheryl

Cousan, Varanese

Cover, Patricia

Coyne, Joseph

Crayton, Bonita

Crier, Williestine

Cross, Karen

Crowley, Kimberly

Cunningham, Angela

Cunningham, Catherine

Curran, Lyn

Daigle, Brandilyn

Daniel, Janine

Daniel, Margaret

Daniel-Alford, Marcia

Daniels, Wade

Darrington, Christianna

Davidson, Barbara

Davis, Randolph

Davis, Yvonne

Day, Nicola

Dear, Charles

Dearman, Mary

Debeau, Daphne

Declouet, Dorothy

Del Corral, Emily

Dellacroce, Glenda

Demontluzin, Beryl

Denicola, Christy

Dennis, Patricia

Devall, James

Dicharry, Leslie

Dickey, Haley