NEWSLouisiana Board of
Social Work Examiners
Spring,
2001
Dorinda N.
Noble, LCSW
Chairperson
Baton Rouge, LA |
E.
Taylor Aultman, Jr. LCSW
Vice-Chairperson
New Orleans, LA |
Gretchen
Goodrich, LCSW
Secretary/Treasurer
Baton Rouge, LA |
Theresa
Earthly, LCSW
Board Member
Alexandria, LA |
Robert
Showers, RSW
Board Member
Independence, LA |
Kenna
Morgan Franklin, GSW
Board Member
Shreveport, LA |
Janet
Cothern Zelden
Public Board Member
Mandeville, LA |
Traci
F. Lilley, LCSW
Print
Editor |
|
Brenda B. Trivette,
LCSW, Contributing Editor |
|
Onesimus Internet
Solutions, Inc.
Online Editor |
|
Inside this Issue:
The Disciplinary Process?
Summary of 99-00 complaints
Louisiana Takes Top
Honor
The Year of Grace: 2000
Board Meeting Dates
Many Thanks to
Suzanne and Staff
MSW/GSW Update
Testing Fee Increase
Board To Review All
Supervision Plans
Message From Your Public
Member
Public Member Profile
Board Vacancies
Board Member
Responsibilities
LABSWE and
Professional Organizations
Welcome New Licensees
About Your Address
In Remembrance
Frequently Asked Questions
|
|

|
|
The
Disciplinary Process
Dorinda
Noble, LCSW
“I
heard that a person I graduated with is coming before the Board in a
disciplinary hearing. Has someone made a complaint against me? If you were
holding a disciplinary hearing about my practice, would I know it?”
These
kinds of questions are commonly fielded by LABSWE staff, and they
demonstrate that many of the state’s social workers are unclear about
how the Board handles complaints and disciplinary matters.
LABSWE’s
Rules, Standards, and Procedures lays out the disciplinary process
in great detail. The Social Work Practice Act mandates that instances of
professional misconduct should be investigated and resolved in order to
protect the public from incompetent or unethical practice. The person
against whom the complaint is brought (the Respondent) , however, has due
process rights which are carefully guarded through the process; the
Louisiana Administrative Practices Act helps ensure that the process is
fair and impartial. Here is an overview of the disciplinary process:
COMPLAINT.
All social workers should abide by the Standards of Conduct (Chapter 1
of the Rules, Standards, and Procedures). If a member of the
public believes that a social worker has violated those standards,
he/she should report this matter to LABSWE on the Complaint Report Form
available from the LABSWE office. The complaint must be signed.
At
the next regularly scheduled Board meeting, Board members will review the
complaint in executive session. Board members will ask two questions: 1)
Does the Respondent fall under the Social Work Practice Act? and 2) Would
the alleged behavior, if proven, rise to the level of a violation of the
law or the rules? If the answer to these two questions is yes, the matter
is referred for investigation.
INVESTIGATION.
The LABSWE administrator in relatively simple matters can handle
investigation. In more complex situations, LABSWE refers the matter to
one of its Complaint Investigation Officers (CIO), individuals who are
both social workers and licensed private detectives. At this point, the
Respondent receives a copy of the complaint. Board members do not
participate in the investigation process and, in fact, never see the
investigative file.
The
Disciplinary Process (
continued from page 1)
The CIO has
60 days to investigate the complaint, though he/she may seek and receive
an extension of time if needed. When the investigation is complete, the
CIO recommends one of two courses of action to the Board:
(1)
DISMISSAL. If the CIO finds that the allegations cannot be proved,
the CIO recommends that the Board dismiss the matter. The Board will
act on this recommendation at its next meeting, and the Respondent
will be notified that the case is closed. Written documentation is
kept in a file separate from the social worker’s credential files.
(2)
CONTINUE THE PROCESS. If the CIO believes that the alleged
behavior is likely true and violates the law, he/she recommends a
disciplinary hearing. The Board will then turn the matter over to the
Attorney General’s Office.
ADMINISTRATIVE
COMPLAINT. When a case continues in the process, the CIO submits the
investigative file to the Assistant Attorney General (AAG) assigned to
LABSWE. The AAG, after studying the investigative file and the law,
drafts an Administrative Complaint setting out the issues uncovered
during the investigation and their relationship to the law. This draft
is sent to the respondent, who has a reasonable amount of time to
respond to the charges. If that response adequately addressed the
charges, the AAG may drop the matter. If, however, the response is not
deemed to adequately explain the charges, the AAG prepares the final
Administrative Complaint and sends it to the Board.
CONSENT
ORDER. At any point during this process, the Respondent may choose
to enter into a consent order with LABSWE . Similar to a plea agreement,
the consent order must be approved and signed by the Board in a formal
hearing. When a consent order is entered into a case, the Respondent
forfeits any rights of appeal.
DISCIPLINARY
HEARING. If the Respondent does not enter into a consent order, a
disciplinary hearing is scheduled. The burden of proof lies on the state
to prove that allegations of misconduct are true and violate the law,
and the decision requires a preponderance of evidence rather than proof
beyond a reasonable doubt. The hearing is recorded and transcribed by a
court reporter. Five Board members sit as a Hearing Panel; because they
have not been involved in the investigation nor have they seen the
investigative file, these board members are untainted by any facets of
the investigation or any preconceived notions of whether the allegations
are valid. The Respondent has the right to legal representation and to
present any evidence to support his/her case.
LABSWE
DECISION IS RENDERED. When all the testimony is complete, the
Hearing Panel has 60 days to deliberate, examine testimony, arrive at a
decision and write it, and send the decision to the Respondent. If the
Panel finds that the Respondent has not acted in violation of the law,
the matter is closed. If, however, the Panel finds that the Respondent
has violated the law, the decision will carry appropriate sanctions
(including probation, suspension, or revocation of the social worker’s
credential). The Respondent has the right to appeal this decision to the
19th Judicial District Court; further appeals go to the 1st
Circuit Court of Appeals and finally the state Supreme Court. When
LABSWE finds against the Respondent, the Respondent is held responsible
for LABSWE’s costs of investigation and handling the matter.
This
process is complex and time-consuming. The various stages of the process,
however, serve to protect the due process rights of the social worker, to
protect the public, and to ensure that matters are handled in a fair and
objective fashion. |
|

|
Back
to TOP
|
Recap
of 1999 – 2000 Complaints Received by the
Louisiana
State Board of Social Work Examiners
(July
1, 1999 through June 30, 2000)
| Violations: |
Number: |
| Exploitation |
11 |
| Records |
1 |
| Competency |
4 |
| Child Custody |
7 |
| Relationships |
4 |
| Fee Issues |
1 |
| For not
reporting child abuse |
1 |
| Practicing
social work without a license |
1 |
| Misrepresentation
of credentials |
2 |
| Fraud |
1 |
| Supervision
issues |
1 |
| Sexual abuse of
client |
1 |
| TOTAL |
35 |
|
|

|
Back
to TOP
|
LOUISIANA TAKES TOP HONOR
At the Fall Delegate
Assembly of the Association of Social Work Boards held in Mesa, Arizona on
November 10 and 11, 2000 the Board’s publication, Supervision for
Professional Development and Public Protection: A Guide, won the
Association’s award for Superior Consumer Publication for the Year 2000.
Congratulations to authors Drayton Vincent, LCSW and Dorinda Noble, LCSW.
Dorinda Noble
received a publication award from Janice James, President of Association
of Social Work Boards.
|
|

|
|
The Year of Grace: 2000
The
1999 Social Work Practice Act became law on January 1, 2000. Social
workers across the state had the full calendar year of 2000 to comply with
the law. LABSWE left no stone unturned to inform social workers in
Louisiana about the law and its requirements. To that end, LABSWE sent
numerous informative mailings and newsletters to well over 5000 social
workers. LABSWE, after surveying United Way agency listings in every
community in the state, sent flyers and posters to these agencies to
inform employees about the law. Posters, flyers, and letters were also
sent to all state agencies. The Board posted all of the new information,
regulations, and forms on their webpage (labswe.org). The LABSWE web site
received thousands of hits from people seeking information. Board members
and staff made presentations to professional and agency groups when
requested. LABSWE exhausted every avenue to inform and educate the social
work community of the new rules and procedures which social workers should
follow to comply with the law. |
|

|
Back
to TOP
Board Meeting Dates for 2001:
| March 30 |
| May 4 |
| June 8 |
| July 13 |
| August 17 |
| September 21 |
| October 26 |
| December 7 |
You may contact the board office concerning the
times and places.
LABSWE falls under the Louisiana Open Meetings Act. This
law specifies that every meeting shall be open to the public, unless the
subject of the meeting relates the character and professional competence
of a person, or to the investigation of a complaint or negotiation of
litigation. The schedule for each LABSWE meeting is posted 24 hours ahead
of the scheduled meeting. All votes are public, as are all minutes of the
meetings. |
|

|
Back
to TOP
|
MANY THANKS TO SUZANNE AND THE
STAFF!!
LABSWE,
which shares staff and office space with boards regulating dietitians and
speech therapists in Louisiana, is extremely fortunate to have an
excellent staff to administer its work. Suzanne Pevey, our able
Administrator, has been with this Board almost since the inception in
1972; she has the longest tenure of any social work Board administrator in
the nation. She is a wealth of information and insight about professional
regulation. Emily Efferson, one of her able assistants, is assigned to
LABSWE. All the staff are exceptionally capable and cordial. The work load
for them has been crushing over the last year, as they have overseen the
implementation of the new law and thousands of social workers coming into
compliance with that law. When you have contact with these staff members,
please remember; They are not responsible for creating that law; their job
is to administer the work of the three Boards which employ them. Tell them
you appreciate them and their hard work...LABSWE certainly does!!! |
|

|
Back
to TOP
|
MSW/GSW
Update
If
an MSW is working as a social worker, he or she must file an application
with the Board office immediately upon graduation.
 |
MSWs
can work up to 120 days while they are completing the application
process, i.e., securing official transcript and taking and passing the
Intermediate Examination. |
 |
If
MSWs do not take and pass the examination before the end of the 120
days, LABSWE will send them a certified letter advising that the
approval period has lapsed and that they cannot work as a social
worker until they have successfully passed the exam. |
 |
If
MSWs allow their approval period to lapse without taking the
examination, they must submit another application and fee. |
If
an MSW fails the Intermediate Examination, LABSWE will automatically grant
them the Provisional GSW and include a letter that lists the conditions
for maintaining it. No additional fee will be charged. |
|

|
|
TESTING
FEE INCREASE
The
Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB) voted to increase the examination
fee for all of the social work examinations on April 1, 2001. The fee will
increase from $110.00 per exam to $175.00. The most important
consideration in raising the fee was the association’s costs to maintain
the examination program. The association is committed to meeting its
responsibility to member boards and to examination candidates by
maintaining a high quality testing program.
|
|

|
Back
to TOP
|
BOARD WILL REVIEW
ALL SUPERVISION PLANS
Many people do not realize that supervision forms follow professionals
thru their careers. Should a professional relocate to another state and
attempt to secure licensure there, that state will request those
supervision forms. That is why it is critical that supervision forms be
done in a thoughtful manner, and be completely legible. LABSWE requires
that supervision forms be originals without white-out corrections to
eliminate any question of fraud. They must demonstrate that supervision
goals and activities have been personalized for the particular GSW seeking
licensure.
Starting January 1, 2001 all supervision plans will be reviewed by a
board member. All previous plans were reviewed by staff members for
accuracy of content. Starting January 1, 2001 all supervision plans
submitted to the SBSWE will be reviewed by a Board member. The content of
supervision will be the priority, and Board members will be providing
feedback. Many supervision plans may be returned for revisions or
clarification to the BACS and supervisee. For more information refer to Supervision
for Professional Development and Public Protection: A Guide.
|
|

|
|
A Message from the
LABSWE Public Member…
Louisiana is NOT Last, Janet
Zelden
With the enactment of the 1999
Louisiana Social Work Practice Act, your regulatory board expanded from
five members to seven. The law includes a public member on the Board and
maintains an odd number of members, (that is odd number...not odd member!)
to ensure that no votes are tie votes. Some states have regulatory boards
which do not include a public or consumer member. Hence the
headline...Louisiana is not last on the list of innovative states!!
It can now be said that the Board
has something old and something new...yours truly. I am a retired educator
(elementary teacher and principal for 33 years). That makes me OLD, but
since I am the first public member, that makes me NEW. I am serving
voluntary (no pay) term of three years. My function is to directly
represent the public interest on the Board. The Board’s mandate is to
protect the consumer by ensuring that Louisiana social workers have
supervision and education that ensures professional integrity and
competence in practice.
In November I attended a meeting
hosted by Citizens Advocacy Center (CAC), a national service organization
comprised of public members from licensing boards of various professions
across the nation. There I learned that “a healthy Board is one that
focuses on the consumer and not on itself”. I think that LABSWE lives
out that admonition. I have truly been impressed with the other six
members on our Board. Not only are they social workers with a vested
interest in the profession, but they also focus on the consumer. Together,
we work to keep the profession operating at its highest level for the good
of all.
Given my career, it should be no
surprise that I believe in education. Just as a car needs fuel to keep
running, we need continuing education to perform at our best. Therefore,
providing you with practical, high-quality continuing education is one of
my interests on the Board. Having worked for numerous years with various
social workers, I have the utmost fondness and respect for your
profession. I pledge to do my best to keep it that way.
|
|

|
Back
to TOP
|
Public Member Profile
Public members are often found on
professional regulatory boards. Public members:
 |
Offer the viewpoint of the public in Board
deliberations; |
 |
Have no formal association with the profession or
member of the profession; |
 |
May lower the possibility of Board decisions to
favor the profession over the public interests; |
 |
Increase public trust in government and lends
credibility to the work of the Board; |
 |
Bring a new range of experience and perspectives to
Board deliberations; |
 |
Do not bring technical social work expertise to the
Board. |
|
|

|
|
BOARD VACANCIES
On July 26,
2001, there will be two vacancies on the Louisiana State Board of Social
Work Examiners. LSA R.S. 37:2704, mandates the following qualifications
for Board members:
 |
Citizen
of the United States, |
 |
Resident
of the State of Louisiana, |
 |
Hold
current, valid license, certification or registration |
 |
At
all times the Board shall consist of at least three members who
are engaged primarily in rendering direct services in social work
and at least one member who is engaged primarily in social work
education or a practice specialty other than clinic. |
One vacancy
must be filled by a social worker credentialed at the LCSW level and the
other vacancy may be filled by a social worker credentialed at the RSW,
GSW or LCSW levels. The remaining Board members and their areas of
practice are as follows: E. Taylor Aultman, Jr., LCSW, direct practice,
Theresa Earthly, LCSW, direct practice, Robert Showers, RSW, agency
practice, Kenna Franklin, GSW, educator, and Janet Zelden, public member.
If you are
interested in serving on the Board, you should submit a letter stating
your interest and a resume to the Board office or one of the following
organizations by May 31, 2001:
Louisiana
Association of Clinical Social Workers
5329 Dijon
Drive, Suite 105
Baton Rouge,
LA 70808
Louisiana
Chapter of National Association of Social Workers
700 N. 10th
Street, Suite 200
Baton Rouge,
LA 70801
Louisiana
Council on Social Work Education
311 Huey P.
Long Fieldhouse, LSU
Baton Rouge,
LA 70803
Board
members are appointed by the Governor to serve for three (3) consecutive
years. You may contact Suzanne Pevey, Administrator, at the Board office
(225-763-5470 or 800-521-1941) if you have questions concerning the Board’s
activities and the time commitment required of Board members.
|
|

|
Back
to TOP
|
BOARD MEMBER RESPONSIBILITIES
Members of LABSWE are not paid for
their efforts, though they are reimbursed for travel, lodging, and meals
incurred during Board meetings and functions. Nor can they profit directly
from their Board service.
LABSWE is a hard-working unit; it
meets once a month for two days (Friday and Saturday), and may meet more
often than that. All members are expected to be present for meetings
except in unusual circumstances.
Because LABSWE oversees a complex
practice act, the learning curve is steep for new members. Members are
expected to do a good deal of thinking, reading, and studying to fulfill
their roles, particularly in the area of administrative law. They are also
expected to maintain the highest standards of confidentiality and ethics.
Many LABSWE members find it
challenging to move out of the role of social worker and into the role of
legal administrator. Board members often acknowledge that the most
difficult aspect of their role is sitting in judgment of their peers. They
also say that service on the LABSWE is a rich and interesting experience
which gives them a broader, more comprehensive picture of the profession
and its many aspects.
|
|

|
Back
to TOP
|
LABSWE and Professional
Associations
“ Do I have to belong to
any professional association in order to be credentialed in Louisiana?”
The answer to this frequently asked question is “no”. Neither the 1999
Louisiana Social Work Practice Act nor its 1972 predecessor requires any
collateral membership. Many social workers, however, are confused about
the connections between professional associations (such as National
Association of Social Workers, or Louisiana Clinical Society, or other
worthwhile groups), and the state credentialing structure (Louisiana Board
of Social Work Examiners, or LABSWE).
In order to practice legally in this state, a social worker must be
credentialed; every state in the union, as well as many U.S. territories,
a number of Canadian provinces, and several foreign countries also
credential social workers. A professional has to be credentialed;
he/she gets to belong to a professional association. Professional
associations and state credentialing bodies differ in several ways.
STRUCTURE: A professional association is a not-for-profit
corporation formed at the national, state, or local level and
recognized as 501©(6) organizations under Internal Revenue Code.
State credentialing boards are formed by the state legislatures
through practice acts.
MEMBERS: The association’s primary member is the
individual professional who joins on a voluntary basis, though the
group may also allow related professionals and agencies to join.
Members of credentialing boards, however, are selected by the governor
(as in Louisiana) or the director of the supervising agency (such as
Department of Human Services in some states). The state senate must
confirm them. Credentialing board members are often selected from
lists submitted by professional organizations (as is true in
Louisiana), but board members’ duties are established by statute.
PURPOSES: Professional associations strive to promote
effective services and enhance the status and benefits of the
profession. The over-arching purpose of the credentialing board is to
protect the public.
DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES: Associations often establish
internal disciplinary procedures, such as sanctions or expulsion from
membership, when members violate the Code of Ethics. Such disciplinary
actions taint the individual’s professional reputation and may block
her/him from employment in various settings. Credentialing boards,
however, carry out the disciplinary actions set forth in the practice
act, in order to protect the public. Suspension or revocation of a
credential not only taints the professional’s image, but eliminates
him/her from practice.
OUTSIDE SUPERVISION: Associations are supervised from the
outside by courts. Courts are reluctant to interfere with professional
associations except where the association’s conduct may violate
federal or state laws (such as the anti-trust laws), or when
association disciplinary procedures may not have provided due process
to the member. Courts supervise credentialing boards, and the actions
of the board normally can be appealed to the courts for review. Board
members are subject to possible lawsuits. In addition, boards’
finances and procedures are reviewed by state legislatures and
appropriate agencies, and boards may be subject to sunset review laws.
PROTECTIONS WHICH MUST BE GUARANTEED: Private associations
must afford their members procedural due process. Credentialing boards
must assure both substantive and procedural due process, generally
accomplished through the state Administrative Procedures Act.
Both LABSWE and professional associations are committed to protecting
the public. LABSWE’s single focus on public protection, however, could
conceivably be at odds with association’s interests in professional
enhancement, so, during their tenure, LABSWE board members do not serve on
professional association boards. (Numerous court decisions have recognized
the different purposes of professional associations and state boards, and
have held board members to be in violation of their regulatory
responsibilities when they are closely associated with professional
associations).. Nevertheless, LABSWE is fully committed to working
cooperatively with professional associations in matters that can protect
the public and values the resources that associations can provide in
formulating sound professional principles, supporting worthwhile
legislation, and clarifying professional roles and rules.
|
|

|
Back
to TOP
|
About your address.....
The address and telephone number that you list on your
application for license and subsequent renewal application is a matter of public
record. We do honor written requests to delete addresses and
telephone numbers in our annual Directory. However, if a member of the
public calls and requests that information, we are required by law to give
the most recent information that we have. LCSWs may want to consider
listing only their office address and office telephone number on their
renewal application. |
In Remembrance:
Brooksie B. Kelly, LCSW
West Monroe, LA
The Louisiana State Board of Social Work Examiners will
publish notification of a licensee’s death following submission of
information by a current LCSW or family member
|
|

|
Back
to TOP
|
Frequently
asked questions . . . .
by
Brenda Trivette, LCSW
1.
A social
worker is seeing two teenage brothers, ages 16 and 17. The parents have
joint custody but the boys live with their father. The mother dropped
out of sight several months ago, but is back and wants copies of all
the boys’ records. She also does not want the social worker to tell
the boys she is giving the records to her. Does the social worker have
to give the mother a copy of the boys’ records? How should the
social worker handle this matter?
There
are some mistaken notions about the respective authority of parents of
minor children relating to healthcare decisions and access to minor’s
healthcare records. The joint custody decree of implementation order
usually allocates the legal authority of both parents. Generally, the
joint custody decree will designate a domiciliary parent (parent with
whom the child shall primarily reside) which parent shall be granted
decision-making authority unless the order provides otherwise. All
major decisions affecting the child are subject to court review on
request of the other parent, although the law presumes such decisions
made by the domiciliary parent were made in the best interest of the
child.
If
a domiciliary parent is not designated, both parents have the same
decision-making authority as parents living together. Even when a
domiciliary parent is designated, the law obligates parents to
exchange information concerning the health, education and welfare of
the child and to confer with one another in exercising decision-making
authority.
The
law also makes it clear that access to the minor’s medical, dental
and school records as well as other information “shall not be denied
to a parent solely because he is not the child’s custodial or
domiciliary parent.” La. R.S. 9§ 351. Therefore, under most
circumstances, the father’s permission would not be required for the
mother to have access to the social work records of her minor teenage
sons. The social worker may not agree to shield the mother’s request
for her sons’ records from their father or from the boys themselves.
Such secrecy not only could be damaging to the therapeutic alliance
but also could engender an information power-struggle between the
parents concerning the very data they have a legal obligation to
exchange.
Social
workers treating or evaluating minor children in circumstances of
divorce or separation of the parents should become aware of any joint
custody decree or orders and may request a copy if there is any
uncertainty. Depending upon the subject matter of the social work
issues, and the stated ages of the boys, it may be appropriate to
obtain a written consent from the boys prior to releasing their social
work records to either parent.
2.
A social
worker is asked to do an assessment of an adult female who has
obviously been beaten. The woman has a mental health diagnosis. Is the
social worker required to report this matter to the authorities?
An
adult client (whether male or female) who has been subjected to an
obvious beating requires an assessment to determine if the client is a
“disabled person” (one “with a mental, physical, or
developmental disability that substantially impairs the person’s
ability to provide adequately for his own care or protection”). If
the adult is disabled or is of the age of 60 years or older the social
worker is required to report the abuse (also neglect and exploitation)
to either an adult protection agency or to state and local law
enforcement under La. R.S. 14:403.2(D).
If
the adult female in this question is under 60 and is not disabled as
previously defined, the social worker is not a mandatory reporter and
should maintain client confidentiality. Nevertheless, the social
worker should assist the client access medical, educational, legal and
support services for battered women, if appropriate, and may also
encourage the client to report the beating to appropriate law
enforcement agencies.
3.
If an
individual with a bachelor’s or master’s degree in social work
continues to work after January 1, 2001 without receiving either the
RSW or GSW credential, what happens to them when they do apply for the
credential?
They
will be required to pass an Open Book Examination on the Louisiana
Social Work Practice Act and the Board’s Rules, Standards and
Procedures (developed by the Board) if they work for more than 120
days without the proper social work credential. Should the social
worker not apply for any credential they will receive a letter from
the Board’s Administrator notifying them to cease and desist
practicing social work. Should that letter go unheeded, the social
worker will be subject to misdemeanor violations under the Social Work
Practice Act (La. R.S. 37:2720 (A)(1)) for engaging in the practice of
social work without being duly certified or registered. The Board also
has the authority to enjoin the social work practice in District
Court.
4.
How does
a GSW working as the salaried employee in an agency determine if
he/she is practicing clinical social work?
Rule
No. 505. A. of the Board’s Rules, Standards and Procedures
requires that GSWs not pursuing LCSW licensure, or who are fulfilling
the experience requirement toward licensure, may deliver clinical
services which constitute psychotherapy only under the supervision of
an LCSW. If you are unsure if you are practicing clinical social work
which constitutes psychotherapy, you should review the definition of Clinical
Social Work Practice and Psychotherapy listed in Rule No.
301 with your agency administration and/or supervisor to determine if
your job description and duties meet the definitions.
5.
An MSW
working in a nursing home discovers that a patient has been sexually
abused by a member of the staff. What is the MSW’s responsibility?
The
MSW’s responsibility is to report the incident immediately to the
police. Good social work practice includes reporting to your immediate
supervisor in the nursing home as well.
6.
An LCSW
has an adult client who lives at home with parents, and the parents
pay for his therapy. The client is in school full-time and has a
mental health diagnosis that affects his performance. His parents
would like the social worker to write a letter to the dean of the
school explaining his condition, so that the dean will allow him some
flexibility. Does the social worker need a release from the client,
the parents, or both to write the letter?
The
social worker does not need a signed release from the parents unless
the client is, for some reason, ruled incompetent. An adult client,
regardless of who pays the bills, would have to authorize such action
with a signed release.
7.
An LCSW has another credentialed
social worker as a client in her clinical practice. In the course of
therapy, the client (social worker) reveals that she is having an
affair and sexual relationship with one of her clients. Does the
treating social worker have a
duty to mandatory report this matter to the Social Work Board?
No,
because the superceding ethical issue in this situation is one of
confidentiality. The best interest of the client (the social worker
seeking treatment) would not be served by such mandatory reporting of
an ethical violation. The practitioner should be urged to 1) end the
personal relationships with her own client and 2) provide that client
with appropriate referrals for additional treatment opportunities, and
3) self-report the matter to the Board. The social worker (client)
should continue to work in her own therapy to determine what led to
this ethical infraction in order to ensure that it will not be
repeated The affected client, however, has the right to report it to
the Board at anytime.
|
|

|
Back
to TOP
Welcome New LCSWs
The following social workers have been granted the LCSW license
by the Board since the last newsletter:
|
Adams,
Glenda
Adams,
Lori
Alikhani,
Sarah
Allen,
Elizabeth
Antrobus,
Elise
Aranda,
Brenda
Austin,
Tanya
Bates,
Angel
Bauer,
Elizabeth
Beniger,
Robin
Bennett,
Fay
Benton,
Stephen
Bhushan,
Madhu
Bonitatibus,
Jennifer
Bowie,
Nicole
Braud,
Janis
Breaux,
Helene
Bruneau,
Arianne
Burns,
Gary
Cage,
Lori
Canterbury,
Eddie
Cerise,
Ashley
Chatelain,
Jan
Chiasson-Breaux,
Denise
Clark,
Bridget
Clark,
Pauline
Claypool,
Ann
Coffey,
Leeann
|
Collett,
William
Collins,
Karen
Correro,
Angela
Cuneo,
Carlo
Dejan,
Kellie
Dugas,
Patsy
Dyeson,
Timothy
Flanagan,
Nell
Fletcher,
Robb
Flynn,
Melinda
French,
Allison
Gachassin,
Johnnie
Grayson,
Candance
Greene,
Margaret
Groover,
Benjamin
Guidry,
Sandra
Guy,
Kimberly
Haase,
Nancy
Harper,
Valerie
Hawley,
Patrick
Hebert,
Andrea
Hubert,
Rebecca
Huval,
Angel
Johnson,
Trenese
Jokinen,
Alicia
Kalifey,
Janell
Koch,
Lynne
Leader, Kelli |
Legnon,
Renee
Lewis,
Gail
Lyman,
Dorothy
Maclean,
Stephanie
Maier,
Elizabeth
Martin-Clark,
Sarosa
May,
Heather
Michels,
Janet
Millet,
Manette
Mills,
Kerrie
Morse,
Donna
Oliveira,
Deborah
Outlaw,
Stacy
Owens,
Annie
Pickup,
Joan
Poimboeuf,
John
Powell,
Desarae
Richardson,
Kimberly
Rife,
Ryan
Robert,
Violet
Robertson,
Lauren
Robinson,
Alex
Romero,
Wendy
Rovaris,
James
Ryan,
Ximaena
Schnitzler,
Dan
Seiler,
Katherine
Sevalia,
Jr, Robert
Sharkey,
Lesa
|
Simon-Bowie,
Sudeeptha
Smith,
James
Snyder,
Jr, Thomas
Stalls,
Amy
Tahir,
Lisa
Thomas,
Lora
Threatts,
Tammy
Treigle,
Dawn
Tyler,
Kaye
Valiquette,
Thomas
Walker,
Nelwyn
Wambsgans,
Sylvia
Warren,
Kim
Weiss,
Betsy
Wellborn,
Jennifer
Whitlow,
Sharon
Williams,
Annette
Willis,
Sybil
|
Back
to TOP
Welcome New
GSWs
The following social workers have been granted the GSW
certification by the Board since the last newsletter:
|
Abel,
Allison
Abel,
Mary Ann
Acorn-Mcmillan,
Jo Ann
Adams,
Evelyn
Adams,
Kimberly
Adams,
Shenicka
Adams,
Tasha
Adcock,
Ray
Agu,
Chinyere
Agurcia-Smith,
Ester
Allison,
Joanna
Allord,
Catherine
Alonzo,
Tracy
Alston,
Bonnie
Amos,
Carlos
Anderson,
Brian
Anderson,
Cathleen
Anderson,
Geraldine
Anderson,
Kimberly
Anderson,
Richard
Anderson-Hilton,
Juanita
Ard,
Jennie
Ardoin,
Anthony
Arnold,
Barbara
Aubin,
Amy
Aubrey,
Agnes
Aubry,
Michael
Auguillard-Manego,
Marie
Austin,
Karen
Babineaux,
Amy
Bagalman,
Jill
Bagley
Iii, Edward
Bailey,
Christopher
Baker,
Joan |
Baloney,
Sr., Carl
Banda,
Archana
Banks,
Chalonda
Barden,
Virginia
Barfield,
Cathy
Barker,
Birdel
Barker,
Jamie
Barnett,
Cathy
Barrett,
Robin
Bartleson,
Kimberly
Barton,
Cheryl
Bassett,
Jean
Bassett,
Nathan
Bates,
Charlotte
Bates,
Scott
Batiste,
Tiffany
Beasley,
Juanita
Beauregard,
Christina
Beck,
Michele
Bell,
Pamela
Belou,
Stacy
Belser,
Mary Jo
Benge,
Denise
Benoit,
Judith Ann
Bentil,
Phyllis
Bergeron,
Gina
Bernard,
Sheila
Bezet,
Sandy
Biagi,
Debra
Billiot,
Marleen
Bishopric,
Sarah
Bison,
Tracy
Black,
Jean
Black,
Kelly |
Blake,
Linda
Blanchard,
Alecia
Blanchard,
Misty
Blanchard,
Victor
Blanchard,
Jr, Edgar
Blank,
Christina
Blayre,
Stephanie
Blomkalns,
Sara
Bode,
Brian
Bongiovani,
Gasper
Bonura,
Christine
Bonvillain,
R
Booker,
Aundrial
Bordelon,
Wanda
Bordenave,
Tracey
Borne,
Myra
Borne,
Nikki
Boudreaux,
Daniel
Boudreaux,
Theresa
Boutte',
Mary
Boylan,
Gail
Brady,
Eric
Breaux,
Danielle
Breaux,
Melissa
Breaux,
Shannon
Bridges-Worthy,
Sharon
Brisco,
Robert
Brittenham,
Michelle
Brooks,
Erica
Brooks,
Fetinia
Brooks,
June
Brossett,
Angela
Broussard,
Dina
Brown,
Bernice |
Brown,
Danelle
Brown,
Richard
Brown,
Steven
Bryan,
Jean
Buck,
Jaime
Buddington,
Steve
Burke,
Eddie
Burns,
Lisa
Burton,
Cynthia
Butler,
Harold
Butler,
Mary
Butler,
Maureen
Buxton,
Jean-Marie
Buxton,
Toni
Byrd,
Donald
Cacamo,
Aimee
Cage,
Deborah
Cain,
Madeline
Caldwell,
Lynette
Calvey,
Latonya
Cambrice,
Trinette
Camp,
Joy
Canone,
Kelly
Capdeboscq,
Stacie
Capouch,
Patricia
Cappello,
Valerie
Carey,
Shangrila
Carmouche,
Sontra
Carter,
Alicia
Carter,
Angela
Carter,
Ashley
Carter,
Raegan
Castiglione,
Brandi
Celestine,
Gisele |
|
Chaney-Baker,
Doris
Chaplain,
Maurine
Chapman,
Kimberly
Charles,
Clementine
Charrier,
Clara
Chatman,
Ricky
Chauvin,
Lisa
Cheffin,
Cassandra
Chenevert-Roan,
Jean
Chiasson,
Tina
Chrishon,
Constance
Christophe,
Betty
Cipriano,
Katherine
Claiborne,
Patrina
Clark,
Patricia
Clark,
Yvarra
Clary,
Deborah
Clay,
Grace
Clay,
Terry
Cleary,
Kristina
Clemmer,
Chanin
Clemons,
Kay
Cole,
Deloris
Coleman,
Clois
Coleman-Ashton,
Shontai
Coley,
Alicia
Collins,
Cherie
Collins,
Jessica
Collins,
Leigh
Colston,
Consuela
Colston,
Shirley
Comas,
Ariadne
Conerly,
Linnette
Conerly,
Najla
Cook,
Ann
Coolie,
Lorie
Cooper-North,
Pauline
Cormier,
Rashied
Cormier,
Tracy
Cornelius,
Sheryl
Cousan,
Varanese
Cover,
Patricia
Coyne,
Joseph
Crayton,
Bonita
Crier,
Williestine
Cross,
Karen
Crowley,
Kimberly
Cunningham,
Angela
Cunningham,
Catherine
Curran,
Lyn
Daigle,
Brandilyn
Daniel,
Janine
Daniel,
Margaret
Daniel-Alford,
Marcia
Daniels,
Wade
Darrington,
Christianna
Davidson,
Barbara
Davis,
Randolph
Davis,
Yvonne
Day,
Nicola
Dear,
Charles
Dearman,
Mary
Debeau,
Daphne
Declouet,
Dorothy
Del
Corral, Emily
Dellacroce,
Glenda
Demontluzin,
Beryl
Denicola,
Christy
Dennis,
Patricia
Devall,
James
Dicharry,
Leslie
Dickey,
Haley |
| |